Editorial : External vs. Internal
I came across a picture (right) online that was from a 1954 Christian activity
book entitled "Listen and Do" depicting an Indian man "Praying to his
God." The man is lying down in front of a statue of Buddha.
The caption underneath says the following:
Here is a man in India.
He is praying to his God.
His God cannot help him.
This man must know about Jesus.
Can you think of some ways to help him?
Being a Buddhist I found this picture to be not only insulting but a
perfect illustration of the differences between Christianity and
Buddhism. In talking to a friend I basically pointed out to her
that I felt the main difference is that Christians seek external help
while Buddhist seeks it within themselves. These two ideas are
completely and diametrically incongruent. One can not seek
enlightenment through understanding the self and at the same time seek
an omniscient God for that same purpose.
Christianity is nothing if not the notion that absolution of one's sins
comes through a personal relationship with, and acceptance of,
Jesus. I don't think anyone will argue with me that this is the
main idea expounded by Christians. But there those in this world
that are on a different path, be that Judaism, Islam, Hinduism,
Catholicism, or Buddhism, to name some of the major religions of the
world.
What I find insulting about this seemingly innocent illustration is how
it attacks a belief system that does not attack Christianity. On
the contrary, Buddhism teaches that any religion that is based on love
is a just and right path to God. At least that's what I've been
taught.
The main difference is the idea of external vs. internal. While a
Buddhist seeks enlightenment from within Christians seek that
enlightenment outside of themselves. I think that's why they are
always searching, even after they claim to have found God. If you
believe you have found something don't you stop looking? I tend
to believe that we never stop looking, because it's precisely when we
know we have found what we were looking for that we are lost.
It's precisely because we stop looking that we become lost.
I don't wish this to be an attack on Christianity in any way. I
simply want to point out to Christians that they often come off as
know-it-alls because they claim to have all the answers. But it's
when you're sure that you know all the answer that you have none of the
answers. There is no balance in Christianity, I believe.
The idea of that external force causes Christians to believe that they
need not grow beyond "knowing Jesus." But how can you truly know
Jesus, or anything, without knowing yourself? To me the very idea
is ludicrous.
I certainly don't claim to have any of the answers, but I am asking the
questions. My frustration comes from my questions being answered
with the same response, Jesus, God, and acceptance. If I can't
bring myself to that point then I'm apparently lost. Perhaps I am
lost but I am looking for myself and in so doing so hopefully reach a
state of enlightenment. Call it Nirvana, Heaven, or whatever you
wish to call it; I am seeking this place within myself. I am not
waiting for some external force to swoop down from the heavens and
grant me absolution. It is quite possible that said force does
not exist, and my waiting for the moment that never comes is time not
spent seeking enlightenment within myself.